Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set base pose block: initialisation issues #110

Open
DanielePucci opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Set base pose block: initialisation issues #110

DanielePucci opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@DanielePucci
Copy link
Contributor

Extreme attention must be paid when using the Set base pose block. If it is not run as first block - by defining accurately the blocks' priorities - at the first iteration users may have problems in evaluating quantities that depend on the base roto-translation. If the model represents a control action, a workaround is to use the enable block on the output signal, and wait a little amount of time before writing the command signals. Clearly, this must be dealt with some other low level policy @jeljaik @francesco-romano @traversaro @gabrielenava.

@jeljaik
Copy link
Contributor

jeljaik commented Nov 18, 2015

I will then update this in the documentation of the block.

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

I don't understand. The robot position (as part of the robot state) is not taken in input to all the blocks, as in #106 ?

@DanielePucci
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not all of them. This is being addressed only recently, and we still have blocks that automatically retrieve the robot position unfortunately. That's why back in June, I and @francesco-romano decided to implement the Set base block as a workaround.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants