-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
if probe url includes a https we set the appropriate header, that mag… #1352
Open
whizkid79
wants to merge
1
commit into
nexcess:devel
Choose a base branch
from
whizkid79:devel
base: devel
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How will this impact users not using https? Do you foresee any backward compatibility issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it only triggers when the probe url includes https as protocol, see additional lines below. if this is not the case, the variable will be empty and therefore it will produce the same result like before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So you mean having Host: {{probe_host}} with a value for {{probe_host}} will be the same as having Host: {{probe_host}} where {{probe_host}} will be rendered into an empty string? I'd like to have a cleaner approach to take both http an https into account and not return an empty string instead of the host returned by parse_url.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i didn't change anything on {{probe_host}}. this contains only the host part of the url, e.g. www.website.com. For clarification, i add two sample results, one with and one without https configured for the probe:
Probe url set to
http://www.website.com/test.php
results in:Probe url set to
https://www.website.com/test.php
results in:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My bad, I misinterpreted the preview of the files changed. I thought you deleted {{probe_host}} in favor of {{probe_https}} but that wasn't the case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure where, but this would be good to be written down somewhere in the docs if it gets merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@miguelbalparda is this PR likely to be merged? If not, I need to overwrite this for my current project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't test this in detail, if it gets merged it will be first in the devel branch and then moved to a stable version after some time, allowing others to test it first.