Skip to content

Issues: mgedmin/check-manifest

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

22 Open 77 Closed
22 Open 77 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Error: No module named build
#172 opened Oct 23, 2024 by mauritsvanrees
2
Added suggestions from check-manifest -v are still ignored
#169 opened May 19, 2024 by stevepiercy
1
5
Suggestions can be misleading
#166 opened Jul 24, 2023 by AWhetter
1
Make it possible to pass --sdist <path-to-sdist> to avoid (re)building an sdist enhancement
#165 opened Jun 28, 2023 by pradyunsg
1
Interest in supporting multiple backends? enhancement
#163 opened Mar 7, 2023 by henryiii
2
Fails on pre-commit.ci - missing ensurepip question
#148 opened Feb 9, 2022 by takluyver
1
4
prune ** excludes absolutely everything, even if followed by graft and include directives bug help-needed
#144 opened Sep 8, 2021 by matthewfeickert
3
check-manifest became super slow help-needed
#141 opened Apr 7, 2021 by jugmac00
7
check-manifest should parse and consider .gitignore file enhancement help-needed
#129 opened Nov 3, 2020 by jhermann
1
Do not depend on distutils enhancement
#121 opened Sep 8, 2020 by mgedmin
RFE: option to ignore pep517 and force the use of setup.py sdist (was: Problem with v0.41 and poetry) enhancement help-needed
#111 opened Feb 26, 2020 by Cito
5
check-manifest shouldn't require a VCS to work enhancement help-needed
#109 opened Nov 28, 2019 by bhearsum
People expect check-manifest to check MANIFEST.in syntactically enhancement help-needed
#85 opened Oct 23, 2018 by mgedmin
3
Read config from tox.ini enhancement
#83 opened Jul 10, 2017 by vuolter
9
--create and --update exit 1 when version control and sdist do not match enhancement
#82 opened Apr 5, 2017 by wmedlar
2
check-manifest isn't aware of links help-needed
#69 opened Jun 5, 2016 by tomschr
1
check-manifest doesn't understand cases where VCS contents legitimately differ from sdist enhancement
#58 opened Nov 12, 2015 by mgedmin
6
check-manifest -c should add MANIFEST.in to the VCS enhancement
#41 opened Dec 23, 2014 by mgedmin
Don't apologize for no reason enhancement
#40 opened Dec 23, 2014 by mgedmin
Relax the *.mo check enhancement
#38 opened Dec 23, 2014 by mgedmin
5
checking via zest-releaser fails if setuptools is provided by a buildout help-needed
#35 opened Nov 25, 2014 by woutervh
9
Warn if manifest has lines that don't do anything enhancement help-needed
#33 opened Oct 1, 2014 by cjerdonek
10
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.