Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use istio.sidecar.inject label instead of annotation #1369

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

ReToCode
Copy link
Member

Partially knative/serving#15521

Proposed Changes

  • Use istio.sidecar.inject label instead of annotation

/assign @skonto

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.19%. Comparing base (a9517c7) to head (afc0086).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1369   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.19%   82.19%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        1601     1601           
=======================================
  Hits         1316     1316           
  Misses        189      189           
  Partials       96       96           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@skonto
Copy link
Contributor

skonto commented Sep 24, 2024

It seems Istio specifies both https://github.com/knative-extensions/net-istio/blob/main/third_party/istio-latest/istio-ci-no-mesh/istio.yaml#L14297. Should we keep it that why? 🤔 Are there any Istio versions that this makes a difference?

@dprotaso
Copy link
Contributor

It seems Istio specifies both https://github.com/knative-extensions/net-istio/blob/main/third_party/istio-latest/istio-ci-no-mesh/istio.yaml#L14297. Should we keep it that why? 🤔 Are there any Istio versions that this makes a difference?

That's a good point - which istio version added support for this in labels?

@ReToCode
Copy link
Member Author

Support was added in 1.11 (https://istio.io/latest/news/releases/1.11.x/announcing-1.11/#updates-to-revision-and-tag-deployments). So I think this should be fine?

@skonto
Copy link
Contributor

skonto commented Sep 25, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

/hold for @dprotaso

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Sep 25, 2024
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Sep 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ReToCode, skonto

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dprotaso
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 25, 2024
@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 8d4a09e into knative-extensions:main Sep 25, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants