-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 535
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ingester.QueryStream: Add support for ignoring context cancellation for chunk queriers #6408
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
998948e
Ingester.QueryStream: Ignore context cancellation for chunk queriers
aknuds1 2cffe7a
Ingester.QueryStream: Pass independent context for chunk queriers
aknuds1 48e51b3
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into arve/chunk-query-igno…
aknuds1 dee03b6
Let dumpContextError figure out timeout
aknuds1 c53f8be
Improve error messages
aknuds1 04fc5d4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into arve/chunk-query-igno…
aknuds1 1885ca5
dumpContextError: Log with debug level instead of warn
aknuds1 173acb0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into arve/chunk-query-igno…
aknuds1 6b1323e
Put functionality behind flag
aknuds1 27644b0
Add changelog entry
aknuds1 4b8e651
Fix comparison
aknuds1 6d9b694
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into arve/chunk-query-igno…
aknuds1 c942adf
Use context.WithoutCancel
aknuds1 76a30ea
Remove experimental from help text
aknuds1 96557ef
Document feature better
aknuds1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[nit] I think calling it "iterating" is a bit misleading. I understand this is coming from the comment above, but in practice what's happening here is that we're "sending" not "iterating".
Same comment applies above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wasn't actually looking at the comment, I was just relating to the fact that
ss.Err()
returns any error having occurred during iteration of thess
iterator. I don't understand how "sending" would be more descriptive, since any error fromss.Err()
would be from failedChunkSeries
iteration, not sending. A failed send should result in an error returned fromclient.SendQueryStream
, no?