feat: add autoware_ prefix to lanelet2_extension

[youtalk]

Description

This PR adds autoware_ prefix to lanelet2_extension.
ref. https://github.com/orgs/autowarefoundation/discussions/4097

Additionally, this PR also changed the autoware_lanelet2_extension to pull from https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware_lanelet2_extension not from https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware_common.
ref. https://github.com/orgs/autowarefoundation/discussions/4671

See also autowarefoundation/autoware#4909.

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Interface changes

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[kosuke55]

@youtalk
Could you please adding any test result? (e.g. psim, lsim, evaluator)
For exmple, we often execute planning test on evaluator and compare with daily test result.
Please refer internal documentation to test with evaluator.

[youtalk]

I've tested the planning simulator with local colcon build artifacts.
https://autowarefoundation.github.io/autoware-documentation/main/tutorials/ad-hoc-simulation/planning-simulation/#basic-simulations

@kosuke55 Thank you for your suggestion. I'm trying to check.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[youtalk]

To smoothly migrate, I modified to accommodate both the deprecated lanelet2_extension and the new autoware_lanelet2_extension. The autoware_common remains but was changed a branch that removes autoware_cmake, autoware_lint_common, and autoware_utils. f1577fd

Once the Autoware Evaluator passed https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/558069d2-166a-5c29-9815-e98bcc98fa8d?project_id=prd_jt, it would be mergable.

[youtalk]

@mitsudome-r @xmfcx
Since https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/558069d2-166a-5c29-9815-e98bcc98fa8d?project_id=prd_jt was passed, please review and merge by your bypass permission if approved.

[mitsudome-r]

LGTM

[youtalk]

😭

/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: No space left on device

https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware.universe/actions/runs/9705460481/job/26787572608?pr=7640#step:12:28511

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.24%. Comparing base (3d849e9) to head (15d6cff).
Report is 535 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7640      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   15.09%   24.24%   +9.14%     
==========================================
  Files        1967     1002     -965     
  Lines      135941    78617   -57324     
  Branches    42122    31033   -11089     
==========================================
- Hits        20520    19059    -1461     
+ Misses      92700    56830   -35870     
+ Partials    22721     2728   -19993     

Flag	Coverage Δ
differential	24.24% <ø> (?)
total	?

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[xmfcx]

I'm trying to fix the space issue here:

• ci(build-and-test-differential): increase free disk space #7669

For now since this has passed the non-cuda test, I will merge it bypassing the restriction.

[youtalk]

@xmfcx Thank you so much!

[mitsudome-r]

I was just testing the build on local machine with cuda and confirmed that it builds fine.

[xmfcx]

Next time you can use the workflow dispatch to validate too:

It will take time but it will validate with cuda.