-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0][FIX] Unittests base_delivery_carrier_label: Separate github test run #786
base: 14.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[14.0][FIX] Unittests base_delivery_carrier_label: Separate github test run #786
Conversation
eab448d
to
e81b8cf
Compare
PR OCA#786 should merged first [FIX] Unittests base_delivery_carrier_label: Separate github test run For dependents addons
46ba3c2
to
7ced30f
Compare
cc @chienandalu @jbaudoux |
PR: OCA#786 [FIX] Unittests base_delivery_carrier_label: Separate github test run For dependents addons
5dfa113
to
d5d26b3
Compare
@mt-software-de Can you drop generated files from your commits? It makes migration easier, preventing cherry-pick conflicts |
@mt-software-de Have you looked at #643 ? I've externalized the automatic package creation in order to not depend on that on base module (in specific ones if needed) |
55bfc88
to
53f9c98
Compare
done |
Can we merge this one? |
ping @jbaudoux, @rousseldenis is it possible to merge this one? |
This PR i blocking a few others. |
@OCA/logistics-maintainers ? |
Otherwise in a scenario with a transfer including moves with packages and without the wrong amount of pieces is send Therefore also the dependency to delivery_package_number can be removed
53f9c98
to
01d4b88
Compare
One Last try Ping @jbaudoux? :-) |
- container: ghcr.io/oca/oca-ci/py3.6-ocb14.0:latest | ||
name: test with OCB | ||
makepot: "true" | ||
exclude: "base_delivery_carrier_label,delivery_carrier_label_batch,delivery_roulier,delivery_roulier_option,delivery_roulier_laposte_fr,delivery_roulier_chronopost_fr,carrier_account_environment" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait, this is going to slow down builds a lot.
Don't we have any better way to handle this? Normally this happens because modules tend to enable features by default. Can't we don anything to prevent that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes but there is No Progress and No Response. See #643
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we please merge this for now. I really waiting on this. If there is anyone which refactors the false implemented addon base_delivery_carrier_label, also the test flow can be changed again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ping
Also #643 will created separate github flow runs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mt-software-de Please have a look to #854
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
Since base_delivery_carrier_label introduced a logic,
to a default stock.quant.package on stock.move.lines.
We always have to deal with it, in other not dependent addons.
The context key
set_default_package
is used in multiple modules which do not have a dependency to base_delivery_carrier_label