Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add stricter types for onboot/hotplug/bonding parameters #257

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

runejuhl
Copy link
Contributor

Adds stricter types for onboot, hotplug and certain bonding parameters.

Also fixes issue in opts-redhat.erb when passed a non-string/non-enumerable value. See https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-network/compare/master...runejuhl:add-stricter-types?expand=1#diff-6114de1a6f90ec85830d2eab0f0815f7R3 .

@juniorsysadmin juniorsysadmin added enhancement New feature or request backwards-incompatible and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 17, 2019
@runejuhl
Copy link
Contributor Author

What's the @voxpupuli convention when making changes with backward-incompatible changes? Any chance of getting this merged in the near future?

@ghoneycutt
Copy link
Member

@runejuhl It is hard to merge this because it has backward compatible changes by adding data types to the class parameters. This is a very good thing, thank you! Since the PR only changes some of the parameters, it cannot easily be merged because someone else then needs to change the remaining ones. If you could add types to the other parameters, we could definitely get this merged. As it is now, it will probably languish unless someone else wants to checkout your work and then do the rest on top of it.

@runejuhl
Copy link
Contributor Author

runejuhl commented Jan 2, 2020

Hi @ghoneycutt

Thank you for the comment. I'll try to find some time to put a bit more work into this PR in the not too distant future ...which will probably end up becoming the "not really near future" 😉

@vox-pupuli-tasks
Copy link

Dear @runejuhl, thanks for the PR!

This is pccibot, your friendly Vox Pupuli GitHub Bot. I noticed that your pull request contains merge conflict. Can you please rebase?

You can find my sourcecode at voxpupuli/vox-pupuli-tasks

1 similar comment
@vox-pupuli-tasks
Copy link

Dear @runejuhl, thanks for the PR!

This is pccibot, your friendly Vox Pupuli GitHub Bot. I noticed that your pull request contains merge conflict. Can you please rebase?

You can find my sourcecode at voxpupuli/vox-pupuli-tasks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants