Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Update OpenAPI specification to add GET endpoint for retrieving styles #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Nov 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new GET endpoint to retrieve specific styles using style_id.
    • Enhanced style creation with updated request parameters and properties.
  • Improvements

    • Refined data structures for style representation, including new required properties.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The OpenAPI specification for the recraft.ai external API has been updated to include a new GET endpoint at /v1/styles/{style_id} for retrieving specific styles. This update introduces new parameters and modifies existing schemas, including the removal of the CreateStyleResponse schema and the addition of required properties in the CreateStyleRequest and Style schemas. These changes aim to enhance the API's functionality regarding style management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/libs/Recraft/openapi.yaml - Added new GET endpoint /v1/styles/{style_id} with style_id parameter (type: string, format: uuid).
- Updated CreateStyleResponse reference in POST /v1/styles to Style schema.
- Added private property in CreateStyleRequest schema.
- Added required properties: style, is_private, and creation_time in Style schema.
- Added substyle property in Style schema.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant Database

    Client->>API: GET /v1/styles/{style_id}
    API->>Database: Retrieve style by style_id
    Database-->>API: Return style data
    API-->>Client: Return style data
Loading

🐰 "In the meadow where styles bloom,
A new path opens, dispelling gloom.
With private secrets and styles so bright,
We hop along, in pure delight!
Each request a dance, each response a cheer,
In the world of Recraft, joy is near!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 5ab33a1 into main Nov 13, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Update OpenAPI specification to add GET endpoint for retrieving styles Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef2fb30 and 9f3fe1d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (9)
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.IStyleClient.CreateStyle.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.IStyleClient.GetStyle.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.Models.CreateStyleRequest.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.Models.CreateStyleResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.Models.CreateStyleResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.Models.Style.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.StyleClient.CreateStyle.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Recraft/Generated/Recraft.StyleClient.GetStyle.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Recraft/openapi.yaml (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/libs/Recraft/openapi.yaml (4)

133-133: LGTM! Good schema reuse.

The change to use the Style schema for the POST response improves consistency and reduces schema duplication.


158-180: LGTM! Well-structured REST endpoint.

The new GET endpoint follows REST best practices:

  • Clear resource path /v1/styles/{style_id}
  • Proper UUID validation for style_id
  • Consistent response schema with POST endpoint

387-389: LGTM! Well-structured schema updates.

The Style schema changes are well-defined:

  • Required fields properly declared
  • Consistent with the request schema
  • Appropriate field types and references

Also applies to: 402-407


133-133: Verify handling of private styles across endpoints.

Please ensure that the ListStyles endpoint properly handles the visibility of private styles. It should:

  1. Only return public styles by default
  2. Include private styles only for their owners

Let's verify the ListStyles endpoint implementation:

Also applies to: 158-180, 207-208, 387-389, 402-407

Comment on lines +207 to +208
private:
type: boolean
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider making private field required.

The private field in CreateStyleRequest should be marked as required to ensure consistent behavior. Currently, it's optional which could lead to ambiguous states.

Apply this diff:

    CreateStyleRequest:
      required:
        - images
        - style
+       - private
      type: object
      properties:
        images:
          type: array
          items:
            type: string
            format: binary
        private:
          type: boolean

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant