-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
8071aff
commit 34f9d80
Showing
1 changed file
with
20 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
--- | ||
last_update: | ||
date: 8/5/2024 | ||
author: CabbageDog | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# Blog Transfer | ||
|
||
Unlike other blogs, this blog aims to copy intresting Q&A from [Robotics StackExchange](https://robotics.stackexchange.com/). Welcome to edit it. | ||
|
||
## Recommend Planner and Controller | ||
[Original Link](https://robotics.stackexchange.com/questions/112476/move-base-and-planner-recommendations) | ||
|
||
Q: Ive tried few planners(TEB,DWA,Navfn) for my robot and all of them have way too much configuration related to obstacles and dynamic obstacles. For now I just want something simple which creates a plan without having to reverse the robot(ackerman steering so can’t do it). It’s fine if the turning radius is large and time taken to reach is longer and no obstacles to worry about. It just has to reach the point. | ||
|
||
Is there any local and global planner for move base which does a simple plan based on all the things such as max straight velocity , max angular velocity and turning radius etc. Any suggestions? | ||
|
||
> A: For an ackerman robot, the recommendation by nav2 is to use the Smac Hybrid-A* Planner, and either the RPP or MPPI controller. As you are looking for minimal configuration at the moment, RPP is likely better for you, as MPPI can take a little tuning to function well. | ||
> | ||
> For both the planner and controller, I would look at the Configuration Guide in the nav2 documentation, as it will give you an idea of which parameters you would have to change, specifically to ensure that they both produce a path that is feasible for your ackerman setup. Things like turning radius and optionally disabling reversing. |