Update for Processing 3.2.4 #9
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Here are proposed changes for the code of the heart rate monitor, the old code could only function in the second version of Processing. The proposed changes now work for the newest version (3.3.2). I figured other individuals could benefit from this and help them get their project done faster and with a lot less headaches. **Side-Note** The only hiccup I encountered in modifying the code and comparing it to the old one's readings was that when it is supposed to be flat-line there is a negative charge that is registered, which was not there when run in Processing v2.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here are some proposed changes for the code of the heart rate monitor, the old code could only function in the second version of Processing. The proposed changes now work for the newest version (3.3.2). I figured other individuals could benefit from this and help them get their project done faster and with a lot less headaches.
Side-Note
The only hiccup I encountered in modifying the code and comparing it to the old one's readings was that when it is supposed to be flat-line there is a negative charge that is registered, which was not there when run in Processing v2.
-RKB