chore: improve rpcresponseFactoryTest

[caicancai]

Motivation:

Explain the context, and why you're making that change.
To make others understand what is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modification:

Describe the idea and modifications you've done.

Result:

Fixes #.

If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced testing coverage for response creation with new test methods for handling null parameters and variadic arguments.
  • Improved clarity by renaming existing test methods to better reflect their functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce new test methods in the RpcResponseFactoryTest class, enhancing the testing coverage for the newResponse method in the RpcFactoryHelper. A test for handling null parameters is added, along with a renaming of an existing test for clarity. Additionally, a new test for variadic string arguments is introduced, improving the overall robustness of the test suite.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java	Added testNewResponseWithNull, renamed testNewResponseWithVaridicArgs to testNewResponseWithVaridicNumberArgs, and added testNewResponseWithVaridicStringArgs.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant RpcResponseFactory
    participant RpcFactoryHelper

    Client->>RpcResponseFactory: requestNewResponse(args)
    RpcResponseFactory->>RpcFactoryHelper: newResponse(args)
    alt args are null
        RpcFactoryHelper-->>RpcResponseFactory: return (0, "OK")
    else args are variadic numbers
        RpcFactoryHelper-->>RpcResponseFactory: return formatted response
    else args are variadic strings
        RpcFactoryHelper-->>RpcResponseFactory: return formatted response
    end
    RpcResponseFactory-->>Client: return response

Loading

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where bunnies play,
New tests hop in to save the day!
With numbers and strings, they dance and twirl,
Validating responses in a joyful whirl.
So let’s celebrate with a leap and a cheer,
For robust testing brings us all near! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

• Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

• You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
• Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 494f868 and e0a8093.

Files selected for processing (1)

• jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (3)

jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java (3)

29-34: LGTM!

The new test method testNewResponseWithNull is correctly implemented and covers a valid scenario.

---

52-56: LGTM!

The test method testNewResponseWithVaridicNumberArgs is correctly implemented and the name change improves clarity.

---

59-65: LGTM!

The new test method testNewResponseWithVaridicStringArgs is correctly implemented and covers a valid scenario.

[caicancai]

Recently I have some time to learn sofa-jraft, but I find it a bit difficult to go deep directly. I think I should start with unit testing. If I can improve it in the process of learning unit testing, I believe I will do my best to improve it so that future contributors can learn.

I hope to help sofa-jraft add new features in the near future. This is a long process.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0a8093 and 23f4b14.

Files selected for processing (1)

• jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java