Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(icq-relayer): reverse conditional pkg/runner.flush for more idiomatic Go #1685

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

odeke-em
Copy link
Contributor

@odeke-em odeke-em commented Jun 30, 2024

By inverting nesting conditions, the code was made much clearer and more idiomatic Go.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for message sending, ensuring clearer processing of failed attempts.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified control flow in message handling, reducing complexity and enhancing readability.
    • Eliminated unnecessary logging for empty message sends, streamlining the process.
    • Streamlined deduplication of messages for efficiency.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 30, 2024

@odeke-em is attempting to deploy a commit to the quicksilver Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the flush function in icq-relayer/pkg/runner/run.go streamline its control flow and error handling. By introducing early returns and simplifying the error management process, the function becomes more readable and maintainable while preserving its core functionality regarding message sending and logging.

Changes

Files Change Summary
icq-relayer/pkg/runner/run.go Refactored flush function for improved control flow and error handling; introduced early returns, simplified error processing, and removed commented-out retry logic.

Poem

🐇 In the code where bunnies play,
A refactor brightens up the day.
With early returns, clear and neat,
Error handling now can't be beat!
Hopping through logic, oh what fun,
Our messages fly, one by one! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

…idiomatic Go

By inverting nesting conditions, the code was made much clearer
and more idiomatic Go.
@odeke-em odeke-em force-pushed the icqrelayer-refactor-with-reverse-conditional branch from 41a6cef to 013f72e Compare June 30, 2024 13:57
_ = logger.Log("msg", "Not enough gas")
case strings.Contains(err.Error(), "request body too large"):
TxMsgs = TxMsgs / 2
LastReduced = time.Now()

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Calling the system time Warning

Calling the system time may be a possible source of non-determinism
@faddat
Copy link
Contributor

faddat commented Jul 14, 2024

I love these here inversions. I am just gonna work though the tests.

@joe-bowman
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8ce9762 and 013f72e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • icq-relayer/pkg/runner/run.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: CodeQL
icq-relayer/pkg/runner/run.go

[warning] 789-789: Calling the system time
Calling the system time may be a possible source of non-determinism

Additional comments not posted (5)
icq-relayer/pkg/runner/run.go (5)

758-759: Early return for empty slice.

The early return for an empty toSend slice improves readability and prevents unnecessary processing.


762-766: Check for nil chainClient.

The check for a nil chainClient is essential to prevent nil pointer dereference errors.


768-771: Early return for empty deduplicated messages.

Returning early if no unique messages are found streamlines the function and avoids unnecessary processing.


776-779: Log successful message batch send.

Logging the successful sending of a batch of messages helps in monitoring and debugging.


782-809: Simplified error handling.

The simplified error handling using a switch statement improves readability and maintainability. However, ensure that all relevant error cases are covered.

Tools
GitHub Check: CodeQL

[warning] 789-789: Calling the system time
Calling the system time may be a possible source of non-determinism

@joe-bowman joe-bowman removed the Stale label Jul 30, 2024
@joe-bowman
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!

@joe-bowman joe-bowman added Stale and removed Stale labels Aug 13, 2024
@joe-bowman
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!

@joe-bowman joe-bowman added Stale and removed Stale labels Aug 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants