Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add guidelines for a good conference transparency report #13

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions docs/python.org/code-of-conduct/Transparency-Report-Guidelines.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
# Releasing a Good Conference Transparency Report

Publishing a transparency report after the event concludes is a critical step for building trust within the community and ensuring the community that any issues that have been reported have been handled in an appropriate manner.

This guide is provided for conference organizers. We particularly hope it is useful for Conference Chairs and Code of Conduct responders.

In this document we're discussing the **public-facing** summary transparency report. For operational purposes, an event should also keep private records of all reports and issues at the event.


## When to release

A timely report helps everybody:

- Reporters know that their reports were taken seriously;
- Attendees can see that CoC reports are an integral part and so feel confident to attend in the future and report issues they themselves witness;
- Organizers demonstrate strong commitment to follow their stated goals and procedures.

Since it's important to be able to recall details of covered issues accurately, a timely report will be of higher quality.

Releasing an initial transparency report should be part of the closing ceremony. Following up with affected parties might take time after the event. Therefore, a separate complete report can be provided in writing at a later time. It wouldn't take more than a month after the event to close the loop on the final report.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My brain is tired, but my gut feeling is we should lean harder on recommending and suggesting using "should" and "would."

Releasing an initial transparency report should be part of the closing ceremony.

Something like, "We recommend including an initial transparency report as part of the closing ceremony."

It wouldn't take more than a month after the event to close the loop on the final report.

I struggled with this sentence. It feels like something we should reword, "We recommend closing the loop on final reports within one month after the event when possible." If we are being 100% transparent here, we have seen reports from conferences take as much as a year or more to fully resolve.



## How to publish

An initial **in-person report** during the closing ceremony is highly recommended. Any information available by that time, including statistics on the number of reports, will be very valuable to attendees at the event. Cases that need following up shouldn't block the initial report from being presented.

After the event, any **official communication channel** used with the attendees is a good option for letting people know a transparency report is available. Examples include:

- Official website for the event;
- Official blog for the event and/or organization behind it;
- Newsletter or mailing list(s) in use around the event.


## What to include

Starting with some general information about the event puts all data in context. Include **the size of the event**, with separate numbers for in-person and online attendees, if applicable. Briefly describe the **reporting process**: who the people enforcing the CoC and responding to reports were, how an attendee could report a CoC issue, and where this information was available for attendees to find.

The main part of the report will be the **statistics of reports** received (including past 3~5 years historical statistics can be helpful for comparison) and the **report status / progress for each report**.

If there was a post-conference survey asking attendees about their confidence in reporting issues, the results of that survey can be included in the following year's transparency report.


## What **NOT** to include

Make sure the transparency report does not include any sensitive information such as the names or any identifiable information of the reporters and the reported people. In the event that law enforcement was called, you should say they were called and not make further comments on the details as it could adversely affect official action.