Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NPUW] Extend ConvToMatmul pattern #27561

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

smirnov-alexey
Copy link
Contributor

Support case where Const has no Convert after it

Copy link
Contributor

@dmatveev dmatveev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One-lines get most of the attention

@@ -1501,6 +1501,7 @@ ConvToMatmul::ConvToMatmul(Context::Ref ctx) {
auto matched_node_transpose_in = node_to_output.at(transpose_in).get_node_shared_ptr();
auto matched_node_transpose_out = node_to_output.at(transpose_out).get_node_shared_ptr();
auto matched_node_multiply = node_to_output.at(multiply).get_node_shared_ptr();
const auto& matched_node_param2_out = uat::_(node_to_output).at_or_at(convert2, multiply);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd call it cvt2_or_multiply - as it is exactly what you're looking up for in the map.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@@ -1536,10 +1537,10 @@ ConvToMatmul::ConvToMatmul(Context::Ref ctx) {
auto new_reshape2 = std::make_shared<ov::op::v1::Reshape>(matched_node_param2, new_const2, false);

// Connect to Reshape
if (ov::op::util::is_parameter(matched_node_param2)) {
if (matched_node_param2_out == matched_node_multiply) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

...then the logic here becomes clear

Suggested change
if (matched_node_param2_out == matched_node_multiply) {
if (cvt2_or_multiply == matched_node_multiply) {

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

matched_node_multiply->input(1).replace_source_output(new_reshape2);
matched_node_multiply->validate_and_infer_types();
} else { // constant -> convert -> multiply
} else {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But some comments documenting what cases you're looking at still would help a lot

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: NPU OpenVINO NPU plugin category: NPUW NPUW plugin
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants