-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UCP/PROTO: Fix RNDV_SCHEME logic #10230
Open
ivankochin
wants to merge
7
commits into
openucx:master
Choose a base branch
from
ivankochin:ucp/proto/fix-rndv-scheme-and-thresh
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
64e1a00
UCP/PROTO: Fix RNDV_SCHEME logic
ivankochin b86a367
UCP/PROTO: Apply CR comments
ivankochin 5914432
UCP/PROTO: FIx static check
ivankochin ee6bf97
UCP/TEST: Handle new behavior when RNDV_SCHEME is not supported
ivankochin 8865649
UCP/TEST: Increase size to meet rndv_get requirement + check required…
ivankochin b6cb6ad
UCP/PROTO: Increase size to cover all cases of rndv/get min_length
ivankochin a9b6ef3
UCP/ATOMIC: Apply review fixes
ivankochin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why? what if this is AM-based rndv?
also if rndv is not supported this test suite should be skipped
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe message confused you. That case is created to handler AM-based RNDV case. AFAIR AM RNDV doesn't set
recv_attr
flags.I can change message here to "RMA is not supported" would it be better from your point of view?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what flag do you mean? AM-based RNDV is using generic flow RTS->RTR->data chunks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My bad, you are right. The thing here is that due to new logic if
RNDV_SCHEME=get_zcopy
and rndv/get/zcopy is unavailable eager can be selected instead of RNDV.So we cannot rely on fact that
UCP_AM_RECV_ATTR_FLAG_RNDV
andUCP_AM_RECV_ATTR_FLAG_DATA
will be set inam_data_handler
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can skip these tests if RNDV not supported but I don't think that it is important