Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SILVA 138.2 for DADA2 #798

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

d4straub
Copy link
Collaborator

@d4straub d4straub commented Nov 15, 2024

Closes #791

I tested with nextflow run d4straub/ampliseq -r add-dada2-silva-138.2 -profile cfc,test --outdir results_add-dada2-silva-138.2 -resume --dada_ref_taxonomy silva and all seemed fine.

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/ampliseq branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core pipelines lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@d4straub d4straub marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2024 17:22
@d4straub
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I added the SILVA 138.2 database to sbdi_compatible_databases , could you confirm that this is fine @erikrikarddaniel ?

@erikrikarddaniel
Copy link
Member

Sure. And if it's not it wouldn't be a big deal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants