refactor(docs): revise code block #3922
Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/docs/styles/sandpack.css (1)
30-33: LGTM, but consider adding a comment explaining the use of!important.The addition of these classes with
height: auto !important;is appropriate for allowing the editor to adjust its size based on content. However, the use of!importantcan sometimes lead to specificity issues.Consider adding a comment explaining why
!importantis necessary here, such as:.sp-editor, .sp-editor-viewer { /* Use !important to override conflicting styles from the Sandpack library */ height: auto !important; }apps/docs/styles/globals.css (1)
146-158: LGTM: Well-implemented expandable indicator. Consider accessibility enhancement.The CSS rule for the summary arrow is well-implemented:
- Use of a pseudo-element for the arrow is appropriate.
- Absolute positioning and specific styling create a consistent look.
- The transition on transform allows for smooth rotation animation.
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider addingaria-hidden="true"to this decorative element in the HTML to enhance accessibility, ensuring screen readers don't announce the arrow character.apps/docs/components/mdx-components.tsx (1)
155-160: LGTM! Consider using a constant for the className.The addition of the "sp-editor" class to the
Codeblockcomponent aligns well with the PR objectives. This change will likely improve the presentation and functionality of code blocks in the documentation.For better maintainability and consistency, consider defining the className as a constant at the top of the file or in a separate constants file. This would make it easier to update the class name across the codebase if needed in the future. For example:
const EDITOR_CLASS_NAME = "sp-editor"; // Then use it in the component <Codeblock className={EDITOR_CLASS_NAME} codeString={codeString} language={language} metastring={meta} />apps/docs/components/docs/components/helper.ts (2)
37-37: Prefer explicit type annotations over usinganyfor better type safety.Using
null as anyforstartTokenbypasses TypeScript's type checking and reduces type safety.Consider updating the type of
startTokento includenullexplicitly:- let startToken: TransformTokens[0][0] = null as any; + let startToken: TransformTokens[0][0] | null = null;This way, you maintain type safety and avoid using
any.
101-101: Typo in comment: 'sure' should be 'ensure'.In the comment on line 101, there's a typo where 'sure' should be 'ensure'.
Update the comment:
- // Add length check to sure it's added to } token + // Add length check to ensure it's added to } token
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/docs/components/docs/components/codeblock.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/docs/components/docs/components/helper.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/components/mdx-components.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/styles/globals.css (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/styles/sandpack.css (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/docs/components/docs/components/codeblock.tsx
[error] 216-216: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 260-260: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
apps/docs/components/docs/components/helper.ts
[error] 116-116: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/docs/styles/sandpack.css (3)
35-39: LGTM: Consistent padding for code lines.The addition of padding to
.token-linewithin.sp-editorprovides consistent spacing for code lines, improving the overall layout and readability of the code blocks.
41-43: LGTM: Appropriate padding for code viewer.The addition of the
.sp-code-viewerclass withpadding: 6px;enhances the visual presentation of the code blocks by providing some space around the content.
Line range hint
1-28: Verify integration with existing styles.The new changes appear to integrate well with the existing styles. However, it's important to ensure that these changes don't introduce any unintended side effects, especially considering the use of
!importantin the new classes.Please run the following script to check for any potential conflicts or overrides:
Also applies to: 45-89
✅ Verification successful
Style Integration Verified Successfully
No conflicting
!importantdeclarations found within.sp-editorand.sp-editor-viewerclasses. The new changes integrate well with existing styles without introducing unintended side effects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential style conflicts or overrides # Test: Search for classes that might conflict with the new .sp-editor and .sp-editor-viewer rg -i '\.sp-(editor|editor-viewer)' --type css # Test: Look for other uses of !important that might conflict rg '!important' --type css # Test: Check for other styles affecting height of .sp-editor or .sp-editor-viewer rg '\.sp-(editor|editor-viewer).*height' --type cssLength of output: 1621
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all '!important' declarations in sandpack.css rg '!important' --type css apps/docs/styles/sandpack.css # Description: Check for '!important' declarations within .sp-editor and .sp-editor-viewer rg '\.sp-(editor|editor-viewer)[^{]*\{[^}]*!important' --type css apps/docs/styles/sandpack.cssLength of output: 442
apps/docs/styles/globals.css (6)
100-102: LGTM: Effective visual feedback for expanded code blocks.The CSS rule correctly applies a 90-degree rotation to the arrow indicator when the details are open, providing clear visual feedback to users.
104-106: Approved, but clarification needed on "custom-folder" class.The CSS rule correctly hides the "custom-folder" span when details are open. However, it would be helpful to have more context on the purpose of this class and its relation to the expanded code block view.
Could you provide more information about the "custom-folder" class and its usage in the code blocks?
108-110: LGTM: Effective use of ellipsis for collapsed content.The CSS rule appropriately adds an ellipsis after the "ellipsis-token" span when the details are not open, providing a clear visual cue that there's more content to be expanded.
112-126: LGTM: Excellent handling of copy token visibility with accessibility in mind.The CSS rules effectively manage the visibility of the "copy-token" span:
- When collapsed, it's visually hidden but still accessible to screen readers.
- When expanded, it's completely hidden.
This approach maintains good accessibility while providing a clean user interface.
128-138: LGTM: Effective collapsed view management. Verify intended behavior.The CSS rules effectively manage the display of collapsed code blocks:
- Closed details are displayed inline.
- Empty tokens and subsequent token lines are hidden when collapsed.
This creates a compact view, which seems appropriate. However, it's worth verifying if this behavior aligns perfectly with the intended user experience across all use cases.
Could you confirm that this collapsed view behavior is consistent with the design specifications and works well for all types of code blocks in the documentation?
140-144: LGTM: Clean and appropriate summary styling.The CSS rules for the summary element are well-structured:
- Inline display ensures it flows with the text.
- Relative positioning allows for absolute positioning of child elements if needed.
- Removing the list-style creates a clean appearance.
These styles contribute to a polished look for the code block summaries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
apps/docs/components/docs/components/helper.ts (2)
142-159: Add more detailed comments to explain the algorithmThe
checkIsFolderfunction uses an efficient stack-based approach to determine if a token represents a folder. However, it could benefit from more detailed comments explaining how the algorithm works. This would make it easier for other developers to understand and maintain the code.Consider adding comments like this:
function checkIsFolder( token: TransformTokens[0], {specialStartFlag, specialEndFlag}: SpecialOptions = {}, ) { // Use a stack to keep track of opening brackets const stack: string[] = []; const mergedStartFlagList = specialStartFlag ? [...startFlag, ...specialStartFlag] : startFlag; const mergedEndFlagList = specialEndFlag ? [...endFlag, ...specialEndFlag] : endFlag; // Iterate through each token for (const t of token) { // If we encounter an opening bracket, push it onto the stack if (mergedStartFlagList.includes(t.content)) { stack.push(t.content); // If we encounter a closing bracket, pop from the stack } else if (mergedEndFlagList.includes(t.content)) { stack.pop(); } } // If the stack is not empty, we have unmatched opening brackets, indicating a folder return stack.length !== 0; }
174-174: Add a comment explaining the purpose of$character replacementThe purpose of replacing
$characters in the line content is not immediately clear. Consider adding a comment to explain why this is necessary.Add a comment like this:
// Remove $ characters to handle special cases (e.g., template literals) const transformLine = line.content.replace(/\$/g, "");apps/docs/components/docs/components/codeblock.tsx (5)
Line range hint
28-38: LGTM: New constants for syntax highlighting look good.The new constants
nextuiCliCommandandhighlightStyleTokenenhance the syntax highlighting capabilities for NextUI CLI commands. This is a valuable addition to the component.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of these constants for better code readability.
Line range hint
166-269: LGTM with suggestions: Enhanced rendering logic for complex code structures.The new implementation using
transformTokensand the added logic for handling folder-like structures significantly improve the component's capabilities. The conditional rendering for different token types enhances the overall functionality.Consider the following optimizations for better performance:
- Memoize the result of
transformTokens(tokens)to avoid unnecessary re-computations on re-renders.- Use
React.useMemofor complex computations within the render method, such as thehighlightStyleToken.some(...)check.- Consider extracting the inner rendering logic (e.g.,
renderLine,renderFolderTokens) to separate components to leverage React's memoization capabilities.Example of memoizing
transformTokens:const memoizedTransformedTokens = React.useMemo(() => transformTokens(tokens), [tokens]);These optimizations can help reduce unnecessary re-renders and improve the overall performance of the component, especially for large code blocks.
151-165: LGTM with suggestion: Improved pre element rendering and styling.The updates to the
preelement, including new class names and data attributes, enhance the styling and flexibility of the code block. The conditional classes for multi-line code and scroll behavior are particularly useful.Consider adding an
aria-labelattribute to thepreelement to improve accessibility. For example:aria-label={`Code block in ${language} language`}This will provide more context for screen reader users about the content of the code block.
Line range hint
210-247: LGTM with issue: Enhanced token rendering with copy and folder support.The new logic for handling 'copy' tokens and folder content significantly improves the component's ability to represent complex code structures. This enhancement allows for more interactive and hierarchical code presentations.
There's a potential issue with missing
keyprops in mapped elements. Specifically:
- In the mapping of
token.folderContent(line 217), each mapped element should have a uniquekeyprop.- In the rendering of empty content (line 221), consider using a more meaningful key than just the index.
To fix these issues, apply the following changes:
- {token.folderContent?.map((folderTokens) => { + {token.folderContent?.map((folderTokens, folderIndex) => { - return folderTokens.map((token, index) => { + return folderTokens.map((token, tokenIndex) => { // Hack for wrap line return token.content === "" ? ( - <div key={`${index}-${getUniqueID("line")}`} /> + <div key={`empty-${folderIndex}-${tokenIndex}-${getUniqueID("line")}`} /> ) : ( - <span key={`${index}-${getUniqueID("line")}`}>{token.content}</span> + <span key={`content-${folderIndex}-${tokenIndex}-${getUniqueID("line")}`}>{token.content}</span> ); }); })}These changes will ensure that each rendered element has a unique key, improving React's ability to efficiently update the DOM.
259-265: LGTM with suggestion: New folder rendering logic.The addition of folder-like structure rendering using
detailsandsummaryelements is a great enhancement. This allows for collapsible code sections, improving the overall user experience when dealing with large or complex code structures.To improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto thesummaryelement that describes the content of the folder. For example:- <summary className="cursor-pointer"> + <summary className="cursor-pointer" aria-label={`Folder: ${folderLine.summaryContent[0].content}`}>This will provide more context for screen reader users about the content of each collapsible section.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/docs/components/docs/components/codeblock.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/docs/components/docs/components/helper.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/docs/components/docs/components/helper.ts (2)
1-11: Well-structured type declarationsThe type declarations are well-defined and make good use of TypeScript features. The
TransformTokenstype utilizes theParametersutility type for accurate type inference, andTransformTokensTypesextends the base token type appropriately for the transformation logic.
116-118: Good job on addressing the previous issueThe previously flagged issue of assignment within an expression has been correctly addressed. The current implementation is cleaner and more readable.
apps/docs/components/docs/components/codeblock.tsx (2)
1-10: LGTM: Import statements and type definitions look good.The new imports and type definitions enhance type safety and introduce new functionality. These changes align well with the refactoring being done to the
Codeblockcomponent.
199-208: LGTM: Improved line number rendering.The updated logic for rendering line numbers with conditional classes based on digit count is a great improvement. This ensures proper alignment and enhances the visual presentation of the code block, especially for files with a large number of lines.
|
Some examples may import other code such as data.js, logo.tsx and etc. Currently it displays in different tabs. For example, |
|
@wingkwong would be great to refactor the examples code to have everything in a single tab e.g. move
|
|
@jrgarciadev yes. actually it's already done in another PRs (See PR3934, 3951, 3960 ..etc). I made it separately for easy review. And this will merge to |
|
@wingkwong merged, please change other PRs (ready) from draft to ready to review |
Closes #
📝 Description
⛳️ Current behavior (updates)
🚀 New behavior
💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No):
📝 Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Codeblockcomponent with improved code highlighting and rendering for different languages, including support for "diff" languages.Bug Fixes
Style
<pre>elements and added new styles for interactive elements to enhance user experience..sp-editorand related classes to ensure better layout and responsiveness.