-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: prevent test matcher warning #3893
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes include updates to the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
117-117
: Consider using a caret version for jest-watch-typeahead.The version is pinned to exactly 2.2.2 while other dependencies use caret versions. This might cause issues when updating dependencies in the future.
- "jest-watch-typeahead": "2.2.2", + "jest-watch-typeahead": "^2.2.2",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- jest.config.js (0 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- jest.config.js
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
76-76
: LGTM! Minor version updates look good.The updates to @testing-library/jest-dom, @types/jest, and eslint-plugin-jest are minor/patch version bumps that align with the PR's objective to fix test matcher warnings.
Also applies to: 79-79, 99-99
116-116
: Verify the major version upgrade of jest-environment-jsdom.The upgrade from v28 to v29 is a major version change that could introduce breaking changes. However, this aligns with the Jest version (^29.7.0) used in the project.
Let's verify the compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
The jest-environment-jsdom upgrade is compatible and properly configured
The upgrade from v28 to v29 of jest-environment-jsdom is safe because:
- It matches the project's Jest version (^29.7.0)
- It's properly configured in jest.config.js with
testEnvironment: "jsdom"
- All related Jest dependencies are on the v29.x series
- The package is correctly listed in package.json and resolved in pnpm-lock.yaml
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any Jest-related warnings or errors in the test output jest --versionLength of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the jest configuration and dependencies cat package.json | jq '.dependencies,.devDependencies' | grep -i jest # Check for any jest configuration files fd -e js -e json -H -I "jest.config" # Look for test setup files that might use jest-environment-jsdom rg -l "jest-environment-jsdom"Length of output: 406
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the jest configuration to see how jest-environment-jsdom is used cat jest.config.js # Check if there are any specific test files using jsdom environment rg -A 3 -B 3 "jest-environment-jsdom"Length of output: 2272
📝 Description
This is a follow-up to PR #3886.
Adjusted to prevent matcher warnings from being displayed.
⛳️ Current behavior (updates)
🚀 New behavior
💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No):
No
📝 Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
@testing-library/jest-dom
and Node.js types in the TypeScript configuration.