Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NumFOCUS -> LF Charities changes #772

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

NumFOCUS -> LF Charities changes #772

merged 8 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

jasongrout
Copy link
Member

These changes update our website to reflect our new home at LF Charities.

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member Author

@Carreau - it seems the netlify handler is having issues: https://app.netlify.com/sites/jupyter-github-io/deploys/671193d6a2b3c700089590c0

Is that handler under your account? It says "Matthias Bussonnier's team/jupyter-github-io"

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member Author

Our netlify preview seems to have problems right now, but here is the donate box at the bottom of jupyter.org/about after this PR:

image

@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Oct 18, 2024

Hum here is the error,

An error occurred while installing bigdecimal (3.1.8), and Bundler cannot
continue.

In Gemfile:
  github-pages was resolved to 232, which depends on
    jekyll-mentions was resolved to 1.6.0, which depends on
      html-pipeline was resolved to 2.14.3, which depends on
        activesupport was resolved to 7.2.1.1, which depends on
          bigdecimal
Error during gem install

Let me know if you need someone to be added to the team, but I think on free plan I'm already at the limit.

@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Oct 18, 2024

Well I tried a random change and it appear that worked...

Anyway, I don't think nettlify really support ruby officially, so maybe we should move to a github action, IDK.

Copy link
Member

@fperez fperez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve the content changes of the PR. I see some failures still in CI, though the PR addresses already a few issues.

As long as those failures can be ignored for the site to build, I say 🚀 . Thanks @jasongrout !

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member Author

I just reran the failing checks and they passed. I think we are good on that front.

@Carreau Carreau merged commit ecba847 into jupyter:main Oct 21, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants