-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 248
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added new when conditions stashed and archived #353
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
When condition for checking if something is stashed by earlier stages
Also fixed a directive generator bug in both stashed and archived when the advanced section got expanded the comparator got filled in.
Tickling the PR builder. |
They use the sh step to produce files
@bitwiseman ping? |
@rsandell Sorry, distracted by other work. Looks like this still needs to pass CI. Trying again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rsandell Looks good to me. Still need to do the documentation, right?
Docs, right :) |
@rsandell Do you have time to do docs for this, or would you like me to pick this up? |
I was originally planning to add these to the
declarative-pipeline-when-conditions-plugin
since these conditions might be a bit niche. But after an hour of fixing "require upper bounds" issues in the pom I found out that the API for allowing other plugins to contribute when conditions wasn't "fixed" yet.