Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(lint): enable perfsprint linter #4090

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor

This PR enables and fixes perfsprint linter to use faster alternatives of fmt.Sprintf

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.93%. Comparing base (3dc1cd6) to head (61b89c4).
Report is 81 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4090      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.21%   98.93%   -0.28%     
==========================================
  Files          42       44       +2     
  Lines        3182     3387     +205     
==========================================
+ Hits         3157     3351     +194     
- Misses         17       25       +8     
- Partials        8       11       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
?
-tags "sonic avx" 98.92% <ø> (?)
-tags go_json 98.92% <ø> (?)
-tags nomsgpack 98.92% <ø> (?)
go-1.18 ?
go-1.19 ?
go-1.20 ?
go-1.21 98.93% <ø> (-0.28%) ⬇️
go-1.22 98.93% <ø> (?)
macos-latest 98.93% <ø> (-0.28%) ⬇️
ubuntu-latest 98.93% <ø> (-0.28%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@appleboy appleboy merged commit 02c1144 into gin-gonic:master Nov 15, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 deleted the perfsprint branch November 15, 2024 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants