Need to compile contracts in order to run demo for tutorial

[andytudhope]

I do worry about how heavy forge install is with suave-geth as a submodule, but hey, that's what we got for now.

[github-actions]

size-limit report 📦

Path	Size	Loading time (3g)	Running time (snapdragon)	Total time
viem (esm)	58.15 KB (0%)	1.2 s (0%)	1.6 s (+118.99% 🔺)	2.7 s
viem (cjs)	76.86 KB (0%)	1.6 s (0%)	938 ms (-29.55% 🔽)	2.5 s
viem (minimal surface - tree-shaking)	3.97 KB (0%)	80 ms (0%)	242 ms (+6.04% 🔺)	321 ms
viem/accounts	89.85 KB (0%)	1.8 s (0%)	759 ms (+79.53% 🔺)	2.6 s
viem/accounts (tree-shaking)	19.5 KB (0%)	390 ms (0%)	340 ms (+6.31% 🔺)	730 ms
viem/actions	43.43 KB (0%)	869 ms (0%)	4.7 s (-19.71% 🔽)	5.5 s
viem/actions (tree-shaking)	348 B (0%)	10 ms (0%)	308 ms (+154.32% 🔺)	318 ms
viem/chains	60.14 KB (0%)	1.3 s (0%)	578 ms (-37.47% 🔽)	1.8 s
viem/chains (tree-shaking)	473 B (0%)	10 ms (0%)	296 ms (+60.89% 🔺)	306 ms
viem/chains/utils	8.01 KB (0%)	161 ms (0%)	127 ms (+39.53% 🔺)	287 ms
viem/chains/utils (tree-shaking)	5.26 KB (0%)	106 ms (0%)	102 ms (-62.27% 🔽)	207 ms
viem/ens	43.43 KB (0%)	869 ms (0%)	3.6 s (-26.33% 🔽)	4.5 s
viem/ens (tree-shaking)	18.01 KB (0%)	361 ms (0%)	323 ms (-1.95% 🔽)	683 ms

[zeroXbrock]

I do worry about how heavy forge install is with suave-geth as a submodule, but hey, that's what we got for now.

agreed, suave-geth is huge. Would be nice to have the contracts in their own repo

[dmarzzz]

I do worry about how heavy forge install is with suave-geth as a submodule, but hey, that's what we got for now.

agreed, suave-geth is huge. Would be nice to have the contracts in their own repo

yeah this is the plan but we need things to stabilize a bit more first as it adds a bunch of friction