docs: Add 2024-10-31 meeting notes (#543)

* docs: Add 2024-10-31 meeting notes

* Update notes/2024/2024-10-31.md

* Update notes/2024/2024-10-31.md

---------

Co-authored-by: Milos Djermanovic <[email protected]>

notes/2024/2024-10-31.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# 2024-10-31 ESLint TSC Meeting Notes
+
+## Transcript
+
+[`2024-10-31-transcript.md`](2024-10-31-transcript.md)
+
+## Attending
+
+- Nicholas C. Zakas (@nzakas) - TSC
+- Milos Djermanovic (@mdjermanovic) - TSC
+- Francesco Trotta (@fasttime) - TSC
+
+@nzakas moderated, and @sam3k took notes.
+
+## Topics
+
+### Statuses
+
+* **@nzakas:** has been working on the CSS plugin and adding concurrency for the `readFile` retrier.
+* **@mdjermanovic:** has been working on config loader caching, new syntax, and spent a lot of time reviewing the `meta.defaultOptions` PR as it updates the core and 70+ rules.
+* **@fasttime:** did the release, completed https://github.com/eslint/rewrite/pull/59 and continued working on fixing drive letter handing on Windows in ESLint. Also did some repo maintenance to fix the build and updated dependencies.
+
+
+### RFC Duty Schedule
+
+* October 28: @mdjermanovic
+* November 4: @fasttime 
+* November 11: @Nicholas C. Zakas 
+* November 18: @mdjermanovic
+
+### [feat: CSS language plugin](https://github.com/eslint/css/pull/2)
+
+This PR is ready for review
+
+**Action Items:** @mdjermanovic will take a look
+
+
+### [Bug: require-atomic-updates false negative when accessing `this`](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/19022)
+
+It seems that this is excepted from the rule, and the question is whether or not that should be the case. If not, should it be a change of default or a new option? This is a valid request. But given that the way this rule works with properties is "controversial" (there were many reports for false positives) and the complexity required to support `this` (as it's not handled by scope manager) we're 50/50 on `accepting/wontfix`. If we do accept, it should be behind an option.
+
+**Resolution:**  we've decided to close as wontfix.
+
+### [Contributor Pool for October 2024](https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint+label%3A%22contributor+pool%22+merged%3A2024-10-01..2024-10-31)
+
+
+- @ota-meshi: $500 for eslint/js#639
+- @LiviaMedeiros: $100 for eslint/eslint#19035
+- @MikeMcC399: $100 for eslint/generator-eslint#194
+- @aryaemami59: $100 for eslint/eslint#18954
+
+
+### Scheduled release for November 1st, 2024
+
+**Action Items:**
+
+- @mdjermanovic will release:
+  - `eslint`
+  - `@eslint/js`
+  - `@eslint/json`
+  - `@eslint/create-config`
+
+### Benchmark Runtime of `v9.12.0` to `v9.14.0`
+
+After the release, I think it would be helpful to compare the runtime of v9.12.0 to v9.14.0 since we'll have implemented two perf improvements (compile cache and config array caching).
+
+**Action Items:**
+
+* folks should compare runtime between these two versions and report back with findings
+* @mdjermanovic will ask in [this issue](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/19025) whether they notice better performance with `9.14.0`
+
+