-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Retrieval eval incomplete #449
Conversation
Links are removed or shortened to ensure the anonymity
Implementation based on ontolearn info added
A set cannot be sorted. Edit: Could you please explain your reasoning behind sorting a set to make the code reproducable ? @Louis-Mozart |
@Louis-Mozart is there any update ? |
Hi @Demirrr. Not really. But I think it is possible because, in Python, sets do not guarantee the order of their elements when converted to lists, this means that each time we convert a set to a list, the order may vary (we can experience this by running the current script many times and add exits like so |
What does it in this sentence refer to ?
A set does not have an ordering in any programming language. Therefore, any such convertion does not have any guarantee. No worries, we will fix this issue |
@LckyLke or @alkidbaci could you take over this PR from @Louis-Mozart ? In case any of you would have a question, you can directly contact to @Louis-Mozart. |
To the reproducibility of the code.
I am not intending to sort a set as this is not possible. But the idea was just to get a sorted list from a set. |
Comments from the previous PR have been included. The set sorting ensures that we always sample the set in the same order. Hence, make the results reproducible.