Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mass transfer setup #561

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

analulujg
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Owner

@danieljprice danieljprice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes look great overall, very happy to merge this with minor changes to comments

@@ -845,6 +845,15 @@ ifeq ($(SETUP), windtunnel)
ANALYSIS=analysis_common_envelope.f90
endif

ifeq ($(SETUP), masstransfer)
# Wind tunnel setup
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please give a useful description as the comment here is propagated directly through to the documentation page: https://phantomsph.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user-guide/setups.html#all-setups

src/main/eos.f90 Outdated
@@ -1444,13 +1444,17 @@ subroutine write_options_eos(iunit)
endif

select case(ieos)
case(2)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can use case(2,12) instead of separate case statements...

!--------------------------------------------------------------------------!
module setup
!
! Setup of two stars or sink particles in a binary
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please give a useful description here if possible (and reference to paper ideally even if it is in prep...)

@danieljprice
Copy link
Owner

build failures are because gamma is not read for a bunch of cases... seems to be caused by the changes to the case statement in read_options_eos ?

@danieljprice danieljprice marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2024 07:35
@danieljprice danieljprice merged commit e153402 into danieljprice:master Aug 7, 2024
180 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants