Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for LINC staging and production APIs #1519
Add support for LINC staging and production APIs #1519
Changes from 7 commits
6d23a4b
fce9ca9
979c076
5071abb
f5a6f1f
5628bc1
45360f9
3e258a4
aa080a1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @aaronkanzer, it looks like https://staging.lincbrain.org isn't able to resolve again. Not sure if we changed anything. See screenshot.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kabilar -- it seems that SSL support isn't provided out-of-the-box for the branch deploys URLs in Netlify
Firefox and Chrome require the SSL enforcement, but if you use Safari, you can proceed without the SSL -- didn't want to disturb the peace here with changing the SSL cert, so didn't update anything for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why this block is commented out -- doesn't LINC provide
/info/
withschema_version
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I was testing, my forked branch is technically tagged as a version of
0+untagged<some-sha-here>
thus I commented this out for testing purposes.As noted in #1519 (comment) -- this will be commented back in once you et. al are happy with the core changes here
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Commented-out code Note
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Commented-out code Note
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment for reference in another issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
might be worth right away to compose this from
known_instances
to avoid hardcoding. WDYT?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just the unit test case -- in the prod. code it isn't hard-coding
Did you have in-mind the hard-coding being removed in the unit test here as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeap. I see no reason to hardcode them in the test here. The purpose is to test to see that all are listed in the particular order. Code could be used to provide that and avoid future edits happen we need to add one more instance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
on this note, chime in to
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the test here
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Commented-out code Note
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Commented-out code Note