-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 759
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support recent versions of TensorFlow, one more #911
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…low, and modified travis to test it
Thanks for working on this! Yes, getting it to work on Travis is very important. It looks like it's still failing? I restarted the build. |
…lawed and passed just accidentially. fixed the test, as well as the test case.
… travis test those two
I was able to make it work on TensorFlow 1.7, there was one test failing due to round-off. That one actually contained a bug and was passing just accidentally. I have adjusted the test-case such that it would fail now, but fixed the test. For TF 1.8+ there seems to be a lot more things breaking. I identified a problem in |
I have been looking at the issue. There are two set of tests failing: The easy one, in
This because the corresponding signature in As for the other one, as @burnpanck pointed out, it's an issue with |
@dustinvtran Would it make sense to refactor I believe the current implementation was possibly based on something like: ...Modified to support swapping and recursive graph definitions. However, it also makes At the moment the implementation is not working with recent |
See issues #882 and #893.
Another pull request (#894) apparently never got merged, maybe because it doesn't fix travis?