Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support recent versions of TensorFlow, one more #911

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

burnpanck
Copy link

@burnpanck burnpanck commented Jul 25, 2018

See issues #882 and #893.
Another pull request (#894) apparently never got merged, maybe because it doesn't fix travis?

@dustinvtran
Copy link
Member

Thanks for working on this! Yes, getting it to work on Travis is very important. It looks like it's still failing? I restarted the build.

@burnpanck
Copy link
Author

I was able to make it work on TensorFlow 1.7, there was one test failing due to round-off. That one actually contained a bug and was passing just accidentally. I have adjusted the test-case such that it would fail now, but fixed the test. For TF 1.8+ there seems to be a lot more things breaking. I identified a problem in copy, where you seem to be constructing the operation first, adding the inputs afterwards. This doesn't work anymore, as TF wants to create the C-implementation in __init__. Since I won't have time to fix this now, I'll simply adjust the requirements to include up to TF 1.7, and leave TF 1.8+ for another day/person. As a side-note, Travis is also failing on TF 1.2 despite that being the minimum requirement in setup.py. I adjusted these requirements to 1.3.0rc0..1.7.0. However Travis seems to fail on some tests irreproducibly, as the comparison of the last two commits shows (they differ only in the travis.yml and the setup.py, but not the actual code).

@diego-ardila-alvarez
Copy link

diego-ardila-alvarez commented Aug 13, 2018

I have been looking at the issue. There are two set of tests failing:

The easy one, in edward/util/random_variables, replace:

bij = tfb.Invert(tfb.SoftmaxCentered(event_ndims=1)) -> bij = tfb.Invert(tfb.SoftmaxCentered())

This because the corresponding signature in tensorflow.contrib.distributions changed in the recent versions.

As for the other one, as @burnpanck pointed out, it's an issue with copy and recursive graphs (e.g. tf.scan(lambda a, x: a + x, tf.constant([1.0, 2.0, 3.0]))). I am trying to find a workaround, as the current logic to handle these cases doesn't seem to work anymore.

@diego-ardila-alvarez
Copy link

@dustinvtran Would it make sense to refactor ed.copy to use contrib.graph_editor?
https://www.tensorflow.org/api_guides/python/contrib.graph_editor

I believe the current implementation was possibly based on something like:

https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/r1.2/tensorflow/contrib/copy_graph/python/util/copy_elements.py

...Modified to support swapping and recursive graph definitions. However, it also makes edward very dependent on the inner workings of tensorflow.

At the moment the implementation is not working with recent tf versions, as the workaround for recursive graphs (defining inputs/outputs after the creation of the operation) conflicts with some recent changes. With contrib.graph_editor things might become more stable, though online editions are not possible. I have just started to use edward, so I don't know if this is too much of a restriction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants