-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add new Option<CryptoProvider>
to client configuration
#138
Draft
oleonardolima
wants to merge
1
commit into
bitcoindevkit:master
Choose a base branch
from
oleonardolima:expose-rust-cryptoprovider-to-user
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this adding a new feature where you can use a proxy with rustls? I'm a little confused why this is being added in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did it because
CryptoProvider
is specific torustls
, so I had to split it intorustls
andopenssl
feature-gated fns, in order to correctly expect thecrypto_provider
parameter.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm I think before doing this PR we should do some refactoring. There is way too much feature gating logic to me.
new_proxy_ssl
, just have a single method that starts an electrum TLS connection given aTcpStream
. Of course then we have a convenience method to do the initial connection to a url string if they don't want proxies. But if they do then it's fine to have them set up the proxy connection themselves.socks5-client
rather than openssl. For TLS we can just be opinionated and use rustls.This seems like something you would want to do anyway @oleonardolima for arti?
I'll turn this into an issue that I think we should tackle first. (here: #146)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I do agree with both (1) and (2), there are also issues with other features such s
proxy
previously mentioned by tnull, refer to #91, which is basically mandatory and we can't use the client with--no-default-features
.Indeed, with
arti-client
I do need the client to receive a data stream (e.g.TcpStream
,arti-client::DataStream
), and was planning on such refactoring. It also requires being async, which detangling all existing features will make it easy to have an async version.Thanks for opening the issue, I'll move this PR back to draft for now.