Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add samples for typeof on array / map #240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

divarvel
Copy link
Collaborator

@divarvel divarvel commented Nov 4, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 4, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #240 will not alter performance

Comparing typeof-array-map-sample (070ea98) with v5 (e59f41d)

Summary

✅ 12 untouched benchmarks

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.86%. Comparing base (7c43662) to head (070ea98).
Report is 5 commits behind head on v5.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               v5     #240      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.68%   68.86%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        5655     5926     +271     
==========================================
+ Hits         3884     4081     +197     
- Misses       1771     1845      +74     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -475,12 +475,10 @@ impl Term {
Term::Map(m) => Term::Map(
m.into_iter()
.map(|(key, term)| {
println!("will try to apply parameters on {key:?} -> {term:?}");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

erf, sorry

@divarvel divarvel merged commit 15931f2 into v5 Nov 5, 2024
7 checks passed
@divarvel divarvel deleted the typeof-array-map-sample branch November 5, 2024 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants