Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update github PR template #4885

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
19 changes: 15 additions & 4 deletions .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,19 +1,30 @@
### Release Summary:
<!-- If this is a feature or bug that impacts customers and is significant enough to include in the "Summary" section of the next version release, please include a brief (1-2 sentences) description of the change. The audience of this summary is future customers, not maintainers or reviewers. See https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/releases/tag/v1.5.7 for an example. Otherwise, leave this section blank -->
maddeleine marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

### Resolved issues:

Resolves #ISSUE-NUMBER1, resolves #ISSUE-NUMBER2, etc.
resolves #ISSUE-NUMBER1, resolves #ISSUE-NUMBER2, etc.

### Description of changes:

Describe s2n’s current behavior and how your code changes that behavior. If there are no issues this PR is resolving, explain why this change is necessary.

### Call-outs:

Address any potentially confusing code. Is there code added that needs to be cleaned up later? Is there code that is missing because it’s still in development?
Address any potentially confusing code. Is there code added that needs to be cleaned up later? Is there code that is missing because it’s still in development? If a callout is specific to a section of code, it might make more sense to leave a comment on your own PR file diff.

### Testing:

How is this change tested (unit tests, fuzz tests, etc.)? Are there any testing steps to be verified by the reviewer?

How is this change tested (unit tests, fuzz tests, etc.)? What manual testing was performed? Are there any testing steps to be verified by the reviewer?
How can you convince your reviewers that this PR is safe and effective?
Is this a refactor change? If so, how have you proved that the intended behavior hasn't changed?

Remember:
* Any change to the library source code should at least include unit tests.
* Any change to the core stuffer or blob methods should include [CBMC proofs](https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/tree/main/tests/cbmc).
* Any change to the CI or tests should:
1. prove that the test succeeds for good input
2. prove that the test fails for bad input (eg, a test for memory leaks fails when a memory leak is committed)
Comment on lines +23 to +27
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can anyone think of other high level testing guidelines that I'm forgetting?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think what you've got is good. Definitely better than what we have already!



By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Loading