-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[VT] Support vdpa device #3718
[VT] Support vdpa device #3718
Conversation
1aa0bda
to
ae68ceb
Compare
70213ef
to
8a8ac3c
Compare
85051c6
to
5e55e6c
Compare
ac91f0c
to
127be9e
Compare
7b6a81e
to
d96cf84
Compare
Here's a kind reminder: CC @zhencliu , @YongxueHong @luckyh , @qingwangrh |
Signed-off-by: Houqi (Nick) Zuo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Houqi (Nick) Zuo <[email protected]>
Add a new class: QBlockdevProtocolVirtioBlkVhostVdpa Signed-off-by: Houqi (Nick) Zuo <[email protected]>
42bf308
to
1e1c540
Compare
I am afraid we cannot set it for it is a 'global' param, if it's set, all images will be skipped @nickzhq Otherwise, the case will be failed by "creating the qemu image" issue**
|
LGTM |
We set the
|
1e1c540
to
52b814e
Compare
Hello @YongxueHong @zhencliu @qingwangrh @luckyh , After this updating, the param @qingwangrh Could you run a testcase using the newest patch and put the result at the comment? My machine is NOT able to run. Thanks! |
failed test |
52b814e
to
30fa10c
Compare
(1/1) Host_RHEL.m9.u3.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.9.3.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.hello_world.q35: STARTED Hello @YongxueHong @zhencliu @qingwangrh @luckyh , @qingwangrh Could you run a testcase using the newest patch and put the result at the comment? Please make a double check, please. Thanks! |
30fa10c
to
fea392e
Compare
LGTM |
Pass test with skip_image_processing = no LGTM |
|
fea392e
to
51bc9ce
Compare
add vdpa device support to the related functions Signed-off-by: Houqi (Nick) Zuo <[email protected]>
51bc9ce
to
23b2a8b
Compare
Hello @YongxueHong @zhencliu @luckyh Hello @qingwangrh , |
Pass test with the following configuration or without. Those configurations look a little redundant. img_check_failed_stg1 = no |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks to @qingwangrh . cc @YongxueHong @zhencliu @luckyh In conclusion, the pretty params should be as following: |
Thanks all @qingwangrh @nickzhq @zhencliu @luckyh |
No description provided.