-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update podspec script to remove 'S' files from watchOS target #277
Update podspec script to remove 'S' files from watchOS target #277
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
9 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
@daltonclaybrook Should this patch also provide the #NO_ASM flag for watchOS, so we can get you all the way to “works fine” for your use-case? |
@Lukasa Good thinking, just added that to the podspec. Let me know if this looks correct to you. In my testing, when I use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This LGTM, I think. @glbrntt want to take a look as well?
@swift-nio-bot test this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Can the podspec be republished for 2.10.3, or will it have to wait for another version? |
I don't believe we can publish a pod spec for the same version again. However, I'm open to cutting a new release explicitly to provide the new pod spec. @glbrntt, how do you feel here? |
New release sounds fine to me. |
This PR resolves #276