Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: tools-2616 tools-2648 support server 6.4 configs #15

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023

Conversation

dwelch-spike
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dwelch-spike dwelch-spike self-assigned this Aug 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@jdogmcsteezy jdogmcsteezy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One comment. LGTM otherwise. Not really sure what I should be reviewing since there are no code changes

Comment on lines +51 to +55
index-type flash {
mount /dummy/mount/point1 /test/mount2
mounts-high-water-pct 30
mounts-size-limit 10G
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be good to test sindex-type flash too since that is new in 6.4

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good suggestion, sindex-type wasn't being parsed, I've added it to the management lib and this test.

@dwelch-spike
Copy link
Contributor Author

One comment. LGTM otherwise. Not really sure what I should be reviewing since there are no code changes

Most of the code ended up being in the mangement lib. The feedback on the test case is helpful, thanks

@dwelch-spike dwelch-spike changed the title feat: tools-2616 support server 6.4 configs feat: tools-2616 tools-2648 support server 6.4 configs Aug 22, 2023
@dwelch-spike dwelch-spike merged commit d1690a8 into main Aug 22, 2023
2 checks passed
@dwelch-spike dwelch-spike deleted the tools-2616 branch August 22, 2023 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants