In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Fix missing lock on sync reset reload
On sync reset reload work, when remote host updates devlink on reload
actions performed on that host, it misses taking devlink lock before
calling devlink_remote_reload_actions_performed() which results in
triggering lock assert like the following:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 1164 at net/devlink/core.c:261 devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
…
CPU: 4 PID: 1164 Comm: kworker/u96:6 Tainted: G S W 6.10.0-rc2+ #116
Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-2028TP-DECTR/X10DRT-PT, BIOS 2.0 12/18/2015
Workqueue: mlx5_fw_reset_events mlx5_sync_reset_reload_work [mlx5_core]
RIP: 0010:devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
…
Call Trace:
? __warn+0xa4/0x210
? devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
? report_bug+0x160/0x280
? handle_bug+0x3f/0x80
? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
devlink_notify+0x88/0x2b0
? mlx5_attach_device+0x20c/0x230 [mlx5_core]
? __pfx_devlink_notify+0x10/0x10
? process_one_work+0x4b6/0xbb0
process_one_work+0x4b6/0xbb0
[…]
References
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Fix missing lock on sync reset reload
On sync reset reload work, when remote host updates devlink on reload
actions performed on that host, it misses taking devlink lock before
calling devlink_remote_reload_actions_performed() which results in
triggering lock assert like the following:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 1164 at net/devlink/core.c:261 devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
…
CPU: 4 PID: 1164 Comm: kworker/u96:6 Tainted: G S W 6.10.0-rc2+ #116
Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-2028TP-DECTR/X10DRT-PT, BIOS 2.0 12/18/2015
Workqueue: mlx5_fw_reset_events mlx5_sync_reset_reload_work [mlx5_core]
RIP: 0010:devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
…
Call Trace:
? __warn+0xa4/0x210
? devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
? report_bug+0x160/0x280
? handle_bug+0x3f/0x80
? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? devl_assert_locked+0x3e/0x50
devlink_notify+0x88/0x2b0
? mlx5_attach_device+0x20c/0x230 [mlx5_core]
? __pfx_devlink_notify+0x10/0x10
? process_one_work+0x4b6/0xbb0
process_one_work+0x4b6/0xbb0
[…]
References