Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renamings and rewordings OFS #1188

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke commented Oct 3, 2024

Summary

  • Implement a new naming scheme for files about local and separated objects at localizations/subuniverses/maps, as discussed with Egbert privately.
  • Improve particular wordings in the OFS namespace.
  • Add a partial converse to the lemma is-trunc-Σ, computes the fibers of map-Σ and add some coherences between composition and map-Σ.
  • Add some basic lemmas about local maps.

@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fredrik-bakke commented Oct 3, 2024

I'm trying out a new file* naming scheme to specify what structure an object is local at.

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke changed the title Renamings and fixes OFS Renamings and rewordings OFS Oct 3, 2024
@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm still unsure about the new naming scheme I'm proposing.

For instance, it will lead to awkward phrasings such as

  • morphisms-of-arrows-cartesian-at-reflective-subuniverses/morphisms-of-arrows-cartesian-at-maps
  • maps-equivalences-at-reflective-subuniverses/maps-equivalences-at-maps
  • maps-connected-at-reflective-subuniverses/maps-connected-at-maps

Perhaps better phrasings are

  • cartesian-morphisms-of-arrows-at-reflective-subuniverses/cartesian-morphisms-of-arrows-at-maps
  • equivalences-at-reflective-subuniverses/equivalences-at-maps (very weird)
  • connected-maps-at-reflective-subuniverses/connected-maps-at-maps (also weird)
  • local-types-at-maps

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2024 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant