Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

修改矩形页面指引不显示问题 #95

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tangdekun
Copy link

@tangdekun tangdekun commented Dec 5, 2023

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced Swiper pagination with a new rectangular style.
  • Refactor

    • Improved construction and styling of pagination elements for better visual representation and behavior.

Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jul 2, 2024
Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jul 2, 2024
@TheAnkurPanchani
Copy link
Owner

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the Swiper widget's pagination by using SwiperPagination.rect for a more defined pagination style and refactoring RectSwiperPaginationBuilder and DotSwiperPaginationBuilder to replace SizedBox with Container. This aims to improve visual presentation and behavior of pagination components in the package.

Changes

Files Change Summary
example/lib/main.dart Updated pagination property of Swiper with SwiperPagination.rect
lib/src/swiper_pagination.dart Refactored RectSwiperPaginationBuilder and DotSwiperPaginationBuilder to use Container instead of SizedBox. Adjusted structure and handling of active/inactive states. Updated SwiperPaginationBuilder typedef formatting.

Tip

AI model upgrade

gpt-4o model for reviews and chat is now live

OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. Please join our Discord Community to provide any feedback or to report any issues.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6aa8343 and 0e207d5.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • example/pubspec.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • pubspec.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (2)
  • example/lib/main.dart (1 hunks)
  • lib/src/swiper_pagination.dart (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • example/lib/main.dart
Additional comments not posted (5)
lib/src/swiper_pagination.dart (5)

121-127: LGTM! Container replacement is appropriate.

The replacement of SizedBox with Container is appropriate and correctly implemented to handle active and inactive states.


178-178: Clarify the log message.

The log message suggests using FractionPaginationBuilder instead of DotSwiperPaginationBuilder, which is appropriate in this context.


178-178: LGTM! Container replacement is appropriate.

The replacement of SizedBox with Container is appropriate and correctly implemented to handle active and inactive states.


240-242: LGTM! Typedef reformatting improves readability.

The reformatting of SwiperPaginationBuilder typedef parameters improves readability and is correctly implemented.


240-240: LGTM! Addition of rect constant is appropriate.

The addition of the rect constant for RectSwiperPaginationBuilder is appropriate and correctly implemented.

@@ -111,22 +111,20 @@ class RectSwiperPaginationBuilder extends SwiperPlugin {
if (itemCount > 20) {
log(
'The itemCount is too big, we suggest use FractionPaginationBuilder '
'instead of DotSwiperPaginationBuilder in this situation',
'instead of DotSwiperPaginationBuilder in this situation',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clarify the log message.

The log message suggests using FractionPaginationBuilder instead of DotSwiperPaginationBuilder, but it should mention RectSwiperPaginationBuilder.

- 'The itemCount is too big, we suggest use FractionPaginationBuilder '
- 'instead of DotSwiperPaginationBuilder in this situation',
+ 'The itemCount is too big, we suggest using FractionPaginationBuilder '
+ 'instead of RectSwiperPaginationBuilder in this situation',
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
'instead of DotSwiperPaginationBuilder in this situation',
'The itemCount is too big, we suggest using FractionPaginationBuilder '
'instead of RectSwiperPaginationBuilder in this situation',

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants