Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed all @Beta annotations #637

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

CharlesDuboisSAP
Copy link
Contributor

@CharlesDuboisSAP CharlesDuboisSAP added please merge Request to merge a pull request please review Request to review a pull request labels Nov 12, 2024
@CharlesDuboisSAP CharlesDuboisSAP self-assigned this Nov 12, 2024
@@ -30,7 +29,6 @@
* Serializable and deserializable response type for SCP CF Destination Service queries.
*/
@Data
@Beta
public class DestinationServiceV1Response
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While I'm fine with this being stable, the @Beta at least warned users from using this class:
We can't guarantee API stability for Destination Service response.

@@ -22,7 +21,6 @@
/**
* Utility class to extract specific values from the SAP Deploy with Confidence request headers.
*/
@Beta
public class DwcHeaderUtils
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to keep the class name?
IMHO "utils" doesn't really fit when interacting with accessor classes. In my head "utils" are working stateless. Debatable.

import io.vavr.control.Try;

@Beta
interface MavenRepositoryAccessor
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Comment)
I thought we could remove metadata generator module, but it seems we are using this for common code between v2 and v4 generators.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
please merge Request to merge a pull request please review Request to review a pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants