Skip to content

Artifact Description (AD) / Artifact Evaluation (AE)

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

RRZE-HPC/LULESH-AD

Repository files navigation

Artifact Description (AD) / Artifact Evaluation (AE)

Title: Analytic Roofline Modeling and Energy Analysis of the LULESH Proxy Application on Multi-Core Clusters

Table of Contents

A. Abstract

B. Description

To allow a third party to duplicate the findings, this article provides reproducibility initiative dependencies (Artifact Description or Artifact Evaluation or Computational Results Analysis) appendix at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14056332. In addition to our extensive performance data artifact, it further describes details regarding the software environments, experimental design, and methodology employed for the results shown in the paper. The computational artifacts will enable experienced performance engineers to reproduce and interpret the data shown in the paper in the appropriate way and to follow the conclusions we draw from it.

B.1 Check-list (artifact meta information)

  • B1.1.1 Algorithms and Programs: We employed MPI and OpenMP parallel programming models for Livermore Unstructured Lagrangian Explicit Shock Hydrodynamics (LULESH) application.

  • B1.1.2 Compilation: All information can be found in builds and scripts.

  • B1.1.3 Binary: x86

  • B1.1.4 Hardware

    • ClusterA: 36 core Intel Xeon Ice Lake (Platinum 8360Y) CPUs and HDR-100 InfiniBand
    • ClusterB: 52 core Intel Xeon Sapphire (Platinum 8470) Rapids CPUs and HDR-100 InfiniBand
    Further information on hardware is available in Table 1 of the paper.
    

  • B1.1.5 Run-time environment and state: A thorough state description of the two systems that were utilized to conduct the experiments can be found in machine-states. This lists comprehensive hardware information on

    • libraries and compilers along with their versions
    • operating system kernel, version and other details
    • CPUset
    • topology (cores, cache, NUMA)
    • NUMA balancing
    • general memory details
    • transparent huge pages
    • performance energy bias
    • hardware power limits

  • B1.1.6 Output

    • Navigate to the output-data-perf-power-energy for additional thoroughly investigated performance, power and energy results, which are inside and outside the results published in the paper:

      • performance [z/s] (total, scalar, vectorized)
      • runtime [s] and speedup
      • FP arithmetic instructions (scalar, packed 128 B, packed 256 B, packed 512 B)
      • Òverall instructions retired
      • memory bandwidth [GBytes/s] (total, read, write)
      • memory data volume [GByte] (total, read, write)
      • operational intensity [F/B]
      • cycles per instruction, CPI
      • power [Watt] (total, chip, DRAM)
      • energy [Joule] (total, chip, DRAM)

  • B1.1.7 Publicly available?
yes

B.2. How software can be obtained (if available)

To download softwares, check out the following website.

B.3. Hardware dependencies

Unless specified otherwise, experiments were conducted on ClusterA (Intel Xeon Ice Lake CPUs) at a base clock-frequency of 2.4 GHz (fixed, turbo disabled), and on ClusterB (Intel Xeon Sapphire Rapid CPUs) at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz (fixed, turbo disabled). The reproducibility of experiments requires mapping consecutive MPI processes to consecutive cores and fixing the frequency and switching-off the turbo mode. For node-level analysis, as the RAPL measurements often differ between nodes, all code versions employed the same node.

B.4. Software dependencies

B.5. Datasets

Table 1 of the paper contains further information on input setup.

C. Installation

Please install the above-mentioned software dependencies.

D. Experiment workflow

To reproduce the experimental results, git clone the following repository and download modified code from the modified-code:

git clone https://github.com/RRZE-HPC/LULESH-AD && cd LULESH-AD/

To run OpenMP- and MPI-parallel LULESH code and to generate performance, power and energy results, the description for compiling and running can be found in the files available at the builds and scripts.

Outputs can be compared with results available in output-data-perf-power-energy.

E. Evaluation and expected result

See paper.

F. Experiment customization

See section 2 of the paper.

G. Results analysis discussion

See paper.

H. Summary

Please see the upshots and Section 7 of the paper that presents the summary.

I. Notes

Please cite the work as:

  • A. Afzal, G. Hager, and G. Wellein: Analytic Roofline Modeling and Energy Analysis of the LULESH Proxy Application on Multi-Core Clusters. DOI:..

Bibtex:

@INPROCEEDINGS{SPEC2023,
author={Afzal, Ayesha and Hager, Georg and Wellein, Gerhard},
booktitle={arxiv},
title={Analytic Roofline Modeling and Energy Analysis of the LULESH Proxy Application on Multi-Core Clusters},
year={2024},
doi={...}}

  • A. Afzal, G. Hager, and G. Wellein: Analytic Roofline Modeling and Energy Analysis of the LULESH Proxy Application on Multi-Core Clusters -- Performance Data Artifact Appendix. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14056332

Bibtex:

@INPROCEEDINGS{SPECAD2023,
author={Afzal, Ayesha and Hager, Georg and Wellein, Gerhard},
booktitle={[online]},
title={Analytic Roofline Modeling and Energy Analysis of the LULESH Proxy Application on Multi-Core Clusters {--} Performance Data Artifact Appendix},
year={2024},
doi={10.5281/zenodo.14056332.}}