-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed case of CiRT peptides not covering RT range #2165
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like it needs more testing, including the adding of CiRT peptides to the document and confirming that transitions get chosen and have library intensity values.
Kaipo, can you get this ready for merge again, and we can push it through to completion this time? |
…k/20220719_cirt_fix
…k/20220719_cirt_fix
…of that - still more to do
…ard/pwiz into Skyline/work/20220719_cirt_fix
- fixed regression graph to deal with all values below zero - stopped writing neutral loss value for every transition
…ard/pwiz into Skyline/work/20220719_cirt_fix
I am working on this now and it is getting closer. Still not entirely sure it achieves the original intent of storing custom iRT standards with ranked transitions and relative abundance information in all cases. |
No description provided.