-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Protein coverage calculation #1810
Comments
Hi Asher, It is calculated by ProteinProphet. If I remember it correctly, it uses all peptides from all samples/input files. Best, Fengchao |
I though we were even going to remove that column, Fengchao? Yes I think it is from ProteinProphet which uses peptides with a weight of 0.5 and above. But philosopher is using a modified razor assignment logic so the set of peptides assigned as razor peptides to each protein is different. But I have to check to see what we are really printing in that column. |
Hi Fengchao and Alexey, Thanks for the quick response. If I am understanding correctly, the peptides in the Best, |
That's correct. The protein coverage calculation was not well implemented in Philosopher. We need to change that. Best, Fengchao |
Got it. Thank you both, this is super helpful! Best, |
Hi all,
I had a quick question regarding how the calculation of protein coverage is performed in the
protein.tsv
report. I was trying to compute protein coverage by using the results that are in thepeptide.tsv
-- basically, I was taking theProtein Start
andProtein End
positions listed for each peptide related to a given protein in the peptide.tsv file, and using these to compute protein coverage. I am finding there is a slight discrepancy between the values. Does the protein coverage listed in theprotein.tsv
report include some additional peptides?Thanks,
Asher
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: