Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not use OMP in one do loop if Intel LLVM is used #89

Closed

Conversation

DusanJovic-NOAA
Copy link

PR checklist

  • Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
    Conditionally enable OMP directives in ice_history.F90 if compiler is not IntelLLVM, which has issues with this loop.
  • Developer(s):
    ENTER INFORMATION HERE
  • Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.
  • Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
    ENTER INFORMATION HERE
  • How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?
    • bit for bit
    • different at roundoff level
    • more substantial
  • Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Does this PR update the Icepack submodule? If so, the Icepack submodule must point to a hash on Icepack's main branch.
    • Yes
    • No
  • Does this PR add any new test cases?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/. A test build of the technical docs will be performed as part of the PR testing.)
    • Yes
    • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
      • Yes
      • No
  • Please document the changes in detail, including why the changes are made. This will become part of the PR commit log.

@DusanJovic-NOAA DusanJovic-NOAA deleted the support_intelllvm branch October 1, 2024 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants