Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Secure Source of Randomness #15

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pixeebot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@pixeebot pixeebot bot commented Nov 3, 2024

This codemod replaces all instances of functions in the random module (e.g. random.random() with their, much more secure, equivalents from the secrets module (e.g. secrets.SystemRandom().random()).

There is significant algorithmic complexity in getting computers to generate genuinely unguessable random bits. The random.random() function uses a method of pseudo-random number generation that unfortunately emits fairly predictable numbers.

If the numbers it emits are predictable, then it's obviously not safe to use in cryptographic operations, file name creation, token construction, password generation, and anything else that's related to security. In fact, it may affect security even if it's not directly obvious.

Switching to a more secure version is simple and the changes look something like this:

- import random
+ import secrets
  ...
- random.random()
+ secrets.SystemRandom().random()
More reading

🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot

Feedback | Community | Docs | Codemod ID: pixee:python/secure-random

Copy link
Contributor Author

pixeebot bot commented Nov 11, 2024

I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?

If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!

Copy link
Contributor Author

pixeebot bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Just a friendly ping to remind you about this change. If there are concerns about it, we'd love to hear about them!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants