Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make ALL basic GT blocks use vanilla models #1785

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2024
Merged

make ALL basic GT blocks use vanilla models #1785

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2024

Conversation

screret
Copy link
Member

@screret screret commented Aug 19, 2024

What

we now use the vanilla rendering path instead of LDLib's, as I've made LDLib able to do CTM and emissive textures on any block.

VERY BREAKING FOR ANYONE USING RendererBlock!!
DO NOT MERGE BEFORE 1.4.1 OR 1.5.0!!

Implementation Details

looootsa json, no more RendererBlock

Outcome

fixes framed block support on casings for example

Additional Information

This section is for screenshots to demonstrate any GUI or rendering changes, or any other additional information that reviewers should be aware of.

Potential Compatibility Issues

breaks virtually all addons that have custom casings probably.

we now use the vanilla rendering path instead of LDLib's, as I've made LDLib able to do CTM and emissive textures on any block.

fixes framed block support for example

VERY BREAKING FOR ANYONE USING `RendererBlock`!!
DO NOT MERGE BEFORE 1.4.1 OR 1.5.0!!
@screret screret added 1.20 Do Not Merge DO NOT MERGE THIS PR YET! type: refactor Suggestion to refactor a section of code labels Aug 19, 2024
@screret screret requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2024 16:26
@screret screret removed Do Not Merge DO NOT MERGE THIS PR YET! 1.20 labels Aug 31, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Ghostipedia Ghostipedia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so many jsons

@screret screret merged commit e62c16f into 1.20.1 Sep 1, 2024
2 checks passed
@screret screret deleted the sc/new-ctm branch September 1, 2024 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: refactor Suggestion to refactor a section of code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants