Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP - Feature issue 564 - FedRAMP Extensions Registry #762

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Rene2mt
Copy link
Member

@Rene2mt Rene2mt commented Oct 8, 2024

Committer Notes

DO NOT MERGE. This PR is a Work In Progress (WIP).

This PR proposes a solution for issue #564.

All Submissions:

By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.

Copy link
Contributor

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So thanks so so much for writing this ADR. It actually served to clear up some things in my head around the gap and the solution it ought to fill.

I first have a high-level question, do we need a registry as a formalized product we maintain, or do we need better documentation point back to the applicable source (i.e. high-fidelity machine-readable info in Metaschema constraint definitions)?

@Rene2mt Rene2mt linked an issue Nov 4, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review of FedRAMP OSCAL Extensions and Values
2 participants