-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cam6_4_045: Vertical diffusion refactor #1176
cam6_4_045: Vertical diffusion refactor #1176
Conversation
…y to avoid numerical differences. Allocating proper matrix dimensions and adding l_cond,r_cond parameters back to left_div.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one question
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! Just had one comment about the current test failures listed in the ChangeLog.
doc/ChangeLog
Outdated
ERP_D_Ln9.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mg17.FLTHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: DIFF) | ||
ERP_Ld3.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mg17.FHISTC_MTt4s.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq1d_aoa (Overall: DIFF) | ||
SMS_D_Ln9.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mg17.FMTHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: DIFF) | ||
SMS_D_Ln9_P1280x1.ne30pg3_ne30pg3_mg17.FHISTC_MTt1s.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s_Leung_dust (Overall: DIFF) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume these and the other "expected diff" test failures will go away once we do regression tests against cam6_4_043
? If not please let me know (as it could indicate something is wrong).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! I just copied these over from the latest tag changelog and was waiting to update it with the info from my runs but it looks like there were errors relating to my build so I'll clean check these out and re-run on Derecho and these should go away and I'll remove these from the log.
Tag name:
Originator(s): @mwaxmonsky
Date: 10/30/2024
One-line Summary: Start refactoring of vertical diffusion to be CCPPized
Github PR URL: #1176
Purpose of changes (include the issue number and title text for each relevant GitHub issue):
Start refactoring of vertical diffusion to be CCPPized and outsources solve phase of non-graft decomp solves to atmospheric physics solver.
Describe any changes made to build system:
Describe any changes made to the namelist: N/A
List any changes to the defaults for the boundary datasets: N/A
Describe any substantial timing or memory changes: N/A
Code reviewed by:
List all files eliminated:
D src/utils/coords_1d.F90
D src/utils/linear_1d_operators.F90
List all files added and what they do: N/A
List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the changes:
M .gitmodules
M bld/configure
M src/atmos_phys
M cime_config/config_pes.xml
M src/physics/cam/diffusion_solver.F90
If there were any failures reported from running test_driver.sh on any test
platform, and checkin with these failures has been OK'd by the gatekeeper,
then copy the lines from the td.*.status files for the failed tests to the
appropriate machine below. All failed tests must be justified.
derecho/intel/aux_cam:
ERP_Ln9.f09_f09_mg17.FCSD_HCO.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: FAIL) details:
SMS_Ld1.f09_f09_mg17.FCHIST_GC.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq1d (Overall: FAIL) details:
SMS_D_Ln9.f19_f19_mg17.FXHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s_amie (Overall: FAIL)
SMS_D_Ln9_P1280x1.ne0CONUSne30x8_ne0CONUSne30x8_mt12.FCHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s (Overall: FAIL)
derecho/nvhpc/aux_cam: All PASS
izumi/nag/aux_cam:
DAE.f45_f45_mg37.FHS94.izumi_nag.cam-dae (Overall: FAIL) details:
izumi/gnu/aux_cam: All PASS
CAM tag used for the baseline comparison tests if different than previous
tag:
Summarize any changes to answers, i.e.,
climate):
N/A
If bitwise differences were observed, how did you show they were no worse
than roundoff?
N/A
If this tag changes climate describe the run(s) done to evaluate the new
climate in enough detail that it(they) could be reproduced, i.e.,
N/A
MSS location of control simulations used to validate new climate: N/A
URL for AMWG diagnostics output used to validate new climate: N/A