Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Expose wasm c_bind to allow creation of an ultra prover #313

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TomAFrench
Copy link
Member

Description

Draft while we're testing integration with the TS library

Checklist:

  • I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line.
  • Every change is related to the PR description.
  • I have linked this pull request to the issue(s) that it resolves.
  • There are no unexpected formatting changes, superfluous debug logs, or commented-out code.
  • There are no circuit changes, OR specifications in /markdown/specs have been updated.
  • There are no circuit changes, OR a cryptographer has been assigned for review.
  • I've updated any terraform that needs updating (e.g. environment variables) for deployment.
  • The branch has been rebased against the head of its merge target.
  • I'm happy for the PR to be merged at the reviewer's next convenience.
  • New functions, classes, etc. have been documented according to the doxygen comment format. Classes and structs must have @brief describing the intended functionality.
  • If existing code has been modified, such documentation has been added or updated.

@TomAFrench TomAFrench changed the title feat: expose wasm c_bind to allow creation of a turbo prover feat: expose wasm c_bind to allow creation of an ultra prover Apr 6, 2023
@kevaundray kevaundray changed the title feat: expose wasm c_bind to allow creation of an ultra prover feat: Expose wasm c_bind to allow creation of an ultra prover Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants