Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

04 mask doesn't works #391

Open
HN-Jiang opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

04 mask doesn't works #391

HN-Jiang opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@HN-Jiang
Copy link

Dear yumorishita,
I have a problem with step 04. I try to mask before go futher. But I think it doesn't works. Even I try 0.9 as threshold, nothing has been masked. Can you please help me take a look?

By the way I'm using LiCSBAS2 now.,

202408151546batch_LiCSBAS_04_05.log
20141218_20150405 unw

@yumorishita
Copy link
Owner

Check coh_avg.png. If you want to keep more pixels, you should decrease the threshold.

@HN-Jiang
Copy link
Author

coh_avg0 3
HI,here is the coh_avg.png. I try 0.1 to 0.9 for mask, but seems nothing has been masked. Because mask.png shows nothing and also in each interferogram file, the file yyyymmdd_yyyymmdd.unw.png is also umpty.

mask

@yumorishita
Copy link
Owner

yumorishita commented Aug 15, 2024

Maybe the output of step03 GACOS already contains no data. Please check GEOCml1GACOS.

@yumorishita
Copy link
Owner

yumorishita commented Aug 15, 2024

I found the cause. The option -r 0:0/0:0 masks all pixels. Don't use it or you must specify a part of the area for -r.

@HN-Jiang
Copy link
Author

Thank you. But sorry, I don't understand this, because as I understand, we can mask the whole image for getting more good interferogram(loop) for step 12. That's why I use -r 0:0/0:0. And ideally it should remove all the pixel that under the threshold, and keep the pixel with good quality. But It looks like all the pixel has been masked(removed).

And I also try to specify an area(My research area), also give the threshold as 0.3. It looks like the given region has been fully masked.

20170430_20170512 unw

@yumorishita
Copy link
Owner

If you mask the whole image, we lose all data and get no result. -r option remove all pixels in the specified area regardless of coherence. If you want to keep the pixels with good quality, you should only use -c option.
If you have a specific area of interest, I recommend first clipping the area by step05 and then applying step04 to the clipped data.

@RaeGeoffrey
Copy link

what is -c option and -r option, where i can find it ?

@yumorishita
Copy link
Owner

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants