-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
04 mask doesn't works #391
Comments
Check coh_avg.png. If you want to keep more pixels, you should decrease the threshold. |
|
I found the cause. The option |
Thank you. But sorry, I don't understand this, because as I understand, we can mask the whole image for getting more good interferogram(loop) for step 12. That's why I use -r 0:0/0:0. And ideally it should remove all the pixel that under the threshold, and keep the pixel with good quality. But It looks like all the pixel has been masked(removed). And I also try to specify an area(My research area), also give the threshold as 0.3. It looks like the given region has been fully masked. |
If you mask the whole image, we lose all data and get no result. |
what is -c option and -r option, where i can find it ? |
Dear yumorishita,
I have a problem with step 04. I try to mask before go futher. But I think it doesn't works. Even I try 0.9 as threshold, nothing has been masked. Can you please help me take a look?
By the way I'm using LiCSBAS2 now.,
202408151546batch_LiCSBAS_04_05.log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: