You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi:
I would like to ask if I encountered a problem when I was about to perform real-time processing validation. I extracted 128 corresponding data from two. sw files and processed them for echo cancellation, resulting in very small values around 0, which is different from the results obtained using. sw files for processing.I don't know why this is happening.
As mentioned above, I have found that once using “speex_ preprocess_ run (den, e_buf)"; It will change the results to all values around 0 or 0, and not using it is good
Hi:
I would like to ask if I encountered a problem when I was about to perform real-time processing validation. I extracted 128 corresponding data from two. sw files and processed them for echo cancellation, resulting in very small values around 0, which is different from the results obtained using. sw files for processing.I don't know why this is happening.
Test code:
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include "config.h"
#endif
#include "speex/speex_echo.h"
#include "speex/speex_preprocess.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#define NN 128
#define TAIL 1024
int test(short echo_buf[], short ref_buf[],short e_buf[])
{
SpeexEchoState *st;
SpeexPreprocessState *den;
int sampleRate = 8000;
}
int main(){
short a[128] = {76, -112, -42, -66, -86, 38, 30 ,92, 143 ,36, -85, -58, -34, -54, -61, -111, 51, 156, 51, -90, -223, -23 ,88, 11, 46, -2, 8, -99, -74, 192, 22, -105, 12,
-83, 127 ,274 ,-42, 33, 9, -38 ,6, -129, 169, -103, -142 ,302, -168, -4 ,137 ,-280, 73, 124, -29 ,168 ,105, -64, -21, 52, -121, -78 ,67, -50 ,43, 70,
-1, -14 ,-36, 188, -94, -366, 64 ,23 ,2, 189, -2, 26, 46, -100, -43 ,-23 ,-45, -15 ,-38, 85,179, 32, -110, -64 ,26, 0 ,55, -50, -93, 81, -93, -35, 99, -61, -35 ,-67, 22 ,41,
-61 ,76, 5, -152, -19, 129, -91, 28 ,232, -42, 8, -45, -183 ,-45, -17, 11 ,110 ,76 ,-86, 66, -17, -163, 249 ,135, -65, 128};
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: