Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[proposal] Use a more opaque bytes signature param for the meta-transaction enabled methods. #61

Open
mirceanis opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[proposal] Use a more opaque bytes signature param for the meta-transaction enabled methods. #61

mirceanis opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mirceanis
Copy link
Contributor

All the "Signed" methods take V, R, S params, but it might be wiser to replace them with a more opaque bytes param for the signature, as that would open up the possibility of using more than just secp256k1 signatures

This would also be a prerequisite for #48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mirceanis